Listeners:
Top listeners:
101 | Interface, Inc. Has Earned the Right to Move Beyond Offsetting, But Others?
100 | The Untold Story of the Voluntary Carbon Market
99 | Mombasa’s Big Ship: Reviving Urban Mangroves by Raising Communities
098 | The Case of the Tangled Titles: Unraveling the Legal Complexities of Land Ownership in the Amazon
97 | The Mosaic, the Minefield, and a Manifesto
096 | Encore Presentation: Tim Mohin on Overcoming Information Asymmetry in the ESG Movement
95 | "Co" Benefits vs "Core Benefits:" Geoff Mwangi and His Theory of Change Steve Zwick
94 | Zimbabwe's Cannabis Queen, Zorodzai Maroveke, AKA "Dr Zoey" Steve Zwick
93| Digitizing Zimbabwe's Farms, with Chiyedza Heri Steve Zwick
92 | COP 28 Article 6: Expectations for Final Day Steve Zwick
The US government estimates that every ton of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere generates at least $40 in damages by contributing to climate change, but the Swedish government says the figure is closer to 100 euros, and it charges a tax to reflect that. Our guest, Gernot Wagner, says both figures are way too low. Today, he explains how economists blend climate science with financial accounting to come up with a price on carbon.
Plus: What’s more effective — cap-and-trade, or a carbon tax? We offer a primer on that debate.
Forest Carbon April 16, 2024
✖
✖
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.
✖