Listeners:
Top listeners:
116 | From Ticking Time Bomb to Demographic Dividend: James Mwangi and Kenya's Great Carbon Valley
115 | Unpacking Donald Trump's Very Weird Environmental Orders
114 | Michael Greene: Carbon Cowboy or Lone Ranger? Part 1
113 | The Future of Environmental Finance: Strategies for Biodiversity and Climate Solutions, with David Hill and George Kelly
112 | Fantasy Football and Dynamic Baselines: New Tools for Impact Assessment
111 | The False Dichotomy Between Reductions and Removals (Rerun)
110| Ecological Economics, Systems Thinking, and the Limits to Growth
109 | How Brazil's Quilombola Communities are Planting the Seeds of Sustainability for Small Farms Around the World, with Vasco van Roosmalen of ReSeed
108 | The Washington Post’s Head Scratcher of a Carbon Story
107 | Francis Bacon and the Prehistory of Climate Finance. Second in an intermittent series on the Untold Story of the Voluntary Carbon Market
The US government estimates that every ton of carbon dioxide emitted into the atmosphere generates at least $40 in damages by contributing to climate change, but the Swedish government says the figure is closer to 100 euros, and it charges a tax to reflect that. Our guest, Gernot Wagner, says both figures are way too low. Today, he explains how economists blend climate science with financial accounting to come up with a price on carbon.
Plus: What’s more effective — cap-and-trade, or a carbon tax? We offer a primer on that debate.
February 25, 2025
January 27, 2025
December 6, 2024
November 28, 2024
✖
✖
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.
✖